What do we stand for? Our Kids and Our Future as a Society

March 15, 2008

Angie asked me to be more clear about what we stand for. We stand for our children and we stand for making their chance at being all that they can be be our priority. We have asked the Government to take a time out and hold off piecemeal change. We have asked them to look at the complete picture that is our children – how they are doing and what kind of result we need and why.

We have said that we will only have trouble and even tragedy if we continue to try and accommodate the competing and irreconcilable interests of the people who earn their living in the sector. We are saying that if we put what our children and our society needs first – then we can fit the suppliers into that picture.

I am sure that I may be upsetting you as I make these statements – so please look at the current reality: please have a look at Teresa Wright’s excellent piece in the Guardian today and ask yourself – how would any person reconcile the competing needs of the stakeholders – the owners, the ECE’s and the Teachers?

  • A small inner group of daycare owners and kindergarten who are worried about new competition or worse – universal Kindergarten – that would threaten their living.
  • ECE’s who are worried that Teachers will take their jobs
  • Teachers who are worried about declining enrollment and see Kindergarten as an opportunity to protect their jobs

This is only human – the livelihoods and the place in society that all hold dear are threatened by any change.

For each of these parties to WIN – means a loss for the others. More daycares and kindergartens of a higher quality than the existing ones, threaten the establishment. So the needs for parents to find more quality and more choice in blocked.

This need to protect the current owners is behind the existence of the Board and behind the attempt to change the act to give the board discretion. It is not about qulaity but protection.

Because we have the system we have, we don’t have quality care available to all children and we don’t even talk about them. Because our system is not universal – very large numbers of children have no access to quality care of any kind – their interests are never given voice.

The people who have the voice are those that have a stake. Owners, ECE’s and Teachers circle each other like packs of wild animals staking out their territory.

Where in all of this bitter life and death contest are the interests of children?

If we stay at this level of debate – the interests cannot be reconciled and the certain losers will be our kids and hence all of us.

For there is another layer of context fro all of this. We will have very few young when we are old. PEI will have amongst the least. Currently about 70% of the young who emerge from high school have neither the skills or the wherewithal to cope in society. We face a terrible crisis. Unless we can shift this so that many more can cope, can work, can be relied on to act as fully fledged adults and citizens – we are doomed.

The only place that we have a hope in acting that might give us a chance is in the early years – before our kids get to school. This is the time of greatest leverage where lifetime trajectories are set.

So if we cannot do a much much better job here soon, it’s all over folks.

No one and no interest group can put their immediate needs ahead of this – this being all our future.

So when we say that we stand for all out kids – we also mean that we stand for having a future here on PEI.

Stepping back and looking at what the real potential is and looking at how many are applying best practices in other places is our only chance


Trust – The Key to Power & Government

March 7, 2008

What happens to a government that can not be trusted? At best, they become immobilized at worst…..

Many Islanders wonder about what went on when the Kindergarten decision was made. Many fear conflict of interest in the process to change the Child Care facilities Act – all the actions of the department so far suggest that it is not being straight with us.

So in an attempt to regain trust, our co chairs wrote last week to Sarah Henry in the department of Social Services asking her to  give the public the information about what is going on in child care that would be expected to be already well tabulated and understood to suggest any such changes.

Our co chairs asked for this information to be ready by today.  The short deadline was determined by:

  1. The government’s own fast track schedule for changing the act
  2. If the department had done the required research to consider any changes, all that we asked for should be ready and pose no problem.

Well it’s Friday and we are looking forward to getting our reply today. Email will work just fine


The Advisory Council for the Status for Women speaks out

March 4, 2008

In summary the Council asks for

  • The issues of discretion
  • A better process of consultation
  • An examination into the role of the Board and any opportunity that there might be a conflict of interest

Here’s the text of a letter that the PEI Status of Women submitted to the current round of Child Care Consultations. (A PDF version is also available for download.) For more on our past positions on early childhood care and education, see our Policy Guide:

Thank you for the opportunity to participate in public consultations on the Child Care Facilities Act review that is currently underway. We appreciate the extended period for consultation.

In June of 2003, the Advisory Council published aPolicy Guide to Early Childhood Care andEducation with a suite of recommendations, mostof which are still relevant today. (Available at http://www.gov.pe.ca/acsw/index.php3?number=75172)

Our policy guide acknowledges that both as consumers and providers of early childhood careand education services, women are faced with barriers to their equality and to their full and active participation in society. It is our belief that matters of quality are inextricable from the Child Care facilities act and that giving quality care means helping children meet their developmental outcomes. Such important work requires a solid infrastructure consisting of qualified early childhood educators and safe and healthy learning environments.

The core values in the Early Childhood Care and Education policy guide include the following:

  • visibility for early childhood care and education
  • availability and accessibilityaffordability
  • quality of care and education
  • inclusivity
  • supportive of parental choice

The scope of these values is wide, and the way we respond to them as a community has significant implications for the wellbeing of our children. The Prince Edward Island government has shown leadership in researching and understanding the importance of the early years, from zero to six. We call on government to respond to what it has learned with active and forward-thinking legislation and policy to support quality early childhood care and education.

The Child Care Facilities Act is an important element of legislation. However, legislation is only part of the story and can only be one part of a solution. Legislation exists in a context where policies and procedures, funds and other resources, and enforcement or non-enforcement can promote or restrain the effectiveness of the Act.

As we review this Act, it is clear that the legislation interacts with policy (including programs, practices, and precedents) and with governance (particularly of the Child Care Facilities Board, a Board given tremendous responsibility under the Act). All of these operate together to determine our ability as a community to create a system for child care and education that reflects core values.

It is clear that questions about the Child Care Facilities Act have sparked a passion in the community. We call on the Province to embrace the opportunity to widen the discussion about how, as a province, we can deliver high quality, affordable, accessible, developmentally focused early learning and care opportunities to our children.

We join community groups that are asking for more consultation so we can bring into clearer focus the hopes and the concerns of parents, educators, owner/operators, children, and citizens. These consultations should help not only to guide changes to the Child Care Facilities Act (or to affirm the Act as it currently stands); rather, they should also engage the public in the questions of policy and governance that work hand in hand to translate the Act into action.

A key point of contention in the current discussion of the Child Care Facilities Act is a question about whether or not the Child Care Facilities Board should have discretion to deny applications for new child care centres, and especially if they should have discretion to deny applications based on number of spaces in a particular region or meeting a particular need. We find that we require more information to assess this issue.

We call on the Province to undertake and to make public a comparative assessment of how “discretion” is legislated and applied in other jurisdictions across Canada.

Specifically, we are interested to learn answers to questions such as the following:

  • When did other jurisdictions legislate “discretion” and why?
  • Who has discretion to make decisions about new centres in each jurisdiction?
  • What measurable effects have followed from allowing discretion? (For example, how many applications for new centres have been rejected, and on what kinds of grounds? Are there measurable improvements in educational and general outcomes for children in regions that allow discretion?)

Answers to these kinds of questions will help us, as members of the community, evaluate the risks and benefits for women as parents and as educators – and for children, as the most important group affected.

Additionally, we ask government to compare the Child Care Facilities Board and its powers in with other agencies, boards, and commissions within the province.

  • Are there similar structures with similar powers, exerting control on issues unrelated to child care?
  • How does the influence in the two matters compare?
  • How do governance procedures and conflict of interest policies apply?

These questions seem important to guiding decisions about what may need to change in the Child Care Facilities Act or in the policy that surrounds it.

We understand that following a research phase and an internal decision-making phase, any revisions of the Act will come forward for public validation. We look forward to opportunities to make input again into the specific issues covered in the Child Care Facilities Act during this validation. We sincerely hope that this consultation will be only a part of a wider consultation and public conversation about early childhood care and education.


Press Release – Postpone the Change to the Act – Have a real Consultation

February 26, 2008

Here is the Press Release that we have issued today – we ask that the government hold on changing the legislation and that they offer Islanders an authentic consultation process.

The attached 1 page backgrounder will provide the reasons for this request

NEWS RELEASE

For Immediate Release
February 26, 2008

PARENTS FOR CHOICE & QUALITY ISSUE
RECOMMENDATION TO MINISTER CURRIE

CHARLOTTETOWN – Parents for Choice & Quality recommend to Minister D.W. Currie, Department of Social Services and Seniors that any changes to the Child Care Facilities Act/Regulations be put on hold until a more comprehensive review of the issues and their potential impact on this critically important matter can take place. This would include a more authentic community consultation process, in addition to a review of such issues as why PEI is the only province in the country with a Child Care Facilities Board; and why the provincial government is considering allowing this structure the latitude to refuse licensing applicants who qualify.

“Our group has grown quickly since it became clear that the Act may be changed in a way that would limit parental choice and possibly impact the quality of child care in PEI.” said April Ennis, Co-Chair of Parents for Choice & Quality.  “After hearing from countless parents, child care professionals and concerned citizens we feel confident in recommending that any changes to the Child Care Facilities Act/Regulations be put on hold until a properly designed community consultation process has been completed.  The current consultation process is not sufficient.  We welcome the opportunity to come to the table and work with the Government in a productive and collaborative manner.”

“We have heard from Minister Currie that he wishes to broaden the consultation process and we support that concept.” said Robert Paterson, a concerned citizen and well known Island blog writer.  “The entire Child Care Facilities Act and Regulations should be thoroughly examined and ample time must be allowed for this work to proceed; it is not something that can be rushed through if we are concerned about enhancing the quality of child care in PEI.”

Parents for Choice & Quality is making this recommendation based on concerns that they have identified related to the following areas; lack of proper community process to date, the potential for conflict of interest from certain members of the current Child Care Facilities Board, the great variance in levels of quality in current child care facilities across the Island, the lack of infant child care spaces currently available and the fact that limiting spaces really means limiting choice and quality. Further information can be found about these issues in the attached Backgrounder.

Parents for Choice & Quality are a group consisting of mothers, fathers, grandparents, child care centres, industry professionals and concerned citizens of PEI that has grown quickly because the current consultation process was designed in reality to limit informed input.  The group is working to ensure that parents get the choice and quality that they deserve for their children.  A website has been established by the group at http://www.choiceandquality.com as well a Facebook group called PEI Child Care Facilities Act and Regulations; which now has in excess of 150 members.

BACKGROUNDER
For Immediate Release
February 26, 2008
Quality & Choice– The stated assumption of the ELOPEI (Early Learning Operators of PEI) and the Department of Social Services is that limiting the number of spaces will create quality. There are 3,000 children on PEI under the age of 24 months. There are 72 licensed child care spaces available for these children. Are 72 spaces sufficient to meet the needs of all of the mothers/fathers who have to go back to work after maternity and parental leave? There are centres that have spaces and there are centres with waiting lists – what does this say about quality? What does this say about the risks of limiting the spaces to the existing centres? How does limiting the number of centres help employees?

Quality and Conflict of Interest– Daycare and Kindergarten on PEI are owned and operated privately (both private and non-profit). We have to remember that. When has limiting competition given the public or employees better quality? Why should the interest of private operators stand ahead of parents and children and the society of Prince Edward Island? Why should child care operators have access to a Board that licenses their competitors? Is this not a conflict of interest? No other province has such a Board that sits between the regulations and the public. What then is the true aim of this Board?

Quality & Risk–We are at risk of not getting the quality that we need if we act too early, before we know what is best.  The opportunity now is to look authentically at what we have and then what we really need and then change the Act.

Quality and Authentic Consultation– To define quality and to get the best system, we need a consultation process that can define true quality. The process of consultation offered to the people of Prince Edward Island so far cannot be justified in a democratic
society. There was already an attempt in the Fall to pass changes to the Act.  These changes would have limited child care spaces.  This occurred with no public input. The changes to the Act were delayed so that a better consultation process could be set up. This has not happened. Very limited time and no context have been offered to the key stakeholders or the general public. Even the recent time extension given does not
compare with other Acts under review; such as the Child Protection act which has a process of months. As important as the time extension is, without the proper context or risk analysis being made available it is virtually impossible for key stakeholders or the general public to provide informed input.

Parents for Choice & Quality are a group consisting of mothers, fathers, grandparents, child care centres, industry professionals and concerned citizens of PEI that has grown quickly because the current consultation process was designed in reality to limit informed
input.  The group is working to ensure that parents get the choice and quality that they deserve for their children.

A website has been established by the group at http://www.choiceandquality.com as well a Facebook group called PEI Child Care Facilities Act and Regulations; which now has in excess of 150 members.

Press Release in PDF form Download here


The “Board” has to go!

February 18, 2008

What would it be like if a inner group of your neighbors had discretion about how the building code was applied if you wanted to add a room to your house? Weird right? Today if you meet code – you can proceed. If you plan to meet code, you will be fine. If your neigbours had control – the process might never end. What if you had annoyed one of them? Could you predict anything unless of course you were on the inside of such a group? Would the regulations mean anything?

Well that is what it is like on PEI to get your self licensed or to get a day care licensed. On PEI we have such an inner group!

The regulations don’t matter as much as getting the support of an inner group who have a vested interest in the status quo.

There is no good reason to have such a group. No other province has one and it should go as part of the changes to the act.

A major part of many people’s concern about the proposed changes to the act is that if the new wording “May” is used in stead of “Shall” that there will be discretion to deny licenses to people who HAVE MET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACT. Officials have been clear. They intend to use this word change to limit the number of new places.

But it gets worse. For the decision makers who will have this discretion are not A bureaucrat working with the delegated authority of the minister but a “Board”. PEI is the only province to have this layer between the people and the minister.

It is this board that will get the discretion and it is this board that already uses its discretion say in staffing. So if you are a specialist in early childhood care but come from another province or another country, your credentials are scrutinized by this body already with full discretion. This discretion in staffing and in who gets paid the government subsidy is already being used.

Where do the members come from?

The board is appointed by the minister. It has one parent – the rest are officials or leading members of the operating community. Of course recommendations as to who sits are made by the key officials to the minister. In effect the existing “in group” run this board.

No other province has such a body. In all others the minister is accountable and the issue at all times is judicial – DO YOU HAVE THE QUALIFICATIONS & DOES YOUR PLACE MEET THE REGULATIONS.

This provides a level playing field.  The core of such a system is the law. You meet the requirements of the law or you don’t. What is the point of having any regulations if meeting them is not the real test. The real test on PEI is whether the inner group like you or not.

The PEI system is confusing, open to abuse and creates a conflict of interest. The board has to go